EMERGENT GRAVITY — LQ8 RESEARCH NOTE Research snapshot: 5 September 2026 https://emergent-gravity.com/ SCOPE LQ8 is an exploratory eight-band quantum-interface Hamiltonian. The latest results include eight stationary interface equilibria under generalized forcing, a direct check of the critical spatial infrared coefficient, and six additional local solar solutions. The nonlocal gravitational field equation remains unsolved. No confirmed new law of gravity is reported. MODEL CURRENT CONSTRAINED CANDIDATE: CASSINI AND MERCURY A new effective metric action gives conditional compatibility with the published solar summaries. It retains the fitted galaxy response, replaces the unstable scalar mode with a momentum-trace constraint, and uses an explicit clock term to allow ordinary homogeneous matter. A tiny ultraweak response term restores the formal zero-field GR limit. These are additional phenomenological assumptions, not a derivation from the quantum bands. Q2 = -0.44352 x 10^-27 s^-2 at the central Gaia field; all 17 sampled Galactic fields enter Cassini's quoted two-sigma band. The metric's GR limit gives about 42.98048 arcsec/century for the approximate Mercury orbit. The additional calculated advance remains below about 2 x 10^-6 arcsec/century in the tested cases. Static 3D and principal constraints are checked through 65-cubed grids, alongside nonlinear variations and independent integrals. No global spacetime solution, independent galaxy validation, nonlinear cosmological fit or spacecraft tracking adjustment is supplied. Cassini and Mercury parameter summaries are correlated. Full study and reproduction: https://emergent-gravity.com/observations/#mercury EARLIER FAILED PROPAGATING-SCALAR ATTEMPT An added known metric/foliation framework preserves the fitted stationary LQ8 response and has beta_PPN = gamma_PPN = 1 at high acceleration. It gives a conditional match to the published Cassini and Mercury summaries. These are correlated constraints, not a new joint fit to spacecraft tracking data. The proposed minimal metric extension fails a local scalar propagation check near the response transition: cs^2/c^2 = -0.02642 at x = 6.418. All 46 archived shapes fail the same stability/preferred-frame combination in the tested metric family. This is not a viable relativistic completion. The failure does not exclude uncomputed nonlocal completions. Study and reproducible source: https://emergent-gravity.com/observations/#metric-attempt EIGHT-BAND HAMILTONIAN H(x,q) = tau_z (sigma_1 sin q_1 + sigma_2 sin q_2) + M tau_x + r_W (2 - cos q_1 - cos q_2) tau_y rho_x + Omega [P_L |1><1| + P_R B(x)^dagger B(x)]. B(x) = (1,-x). The three two-state factors give eight components. Tensor identities are suppressed. M=1, Omega=20, r_W=0.45. The two lowest bands are occupied in the uniform state; energy is the occupied sum divided by two and integrated over the normalized Brillouin zone. The calculation for an L-site cell uses 2L occupied levels and divides the energy by 2L. For small uniform x: e(x)-e(0) = -a2*x^2 + c3*|x|^3 + ... a2 = 0.07225561942046863 c3 = v0*M^3/(6*pi), v0 = Omega/sqrt(Omega^2+4*M^2). The proposed gravitational identification is x=n.grad(Phi)/g_dark. The lattice, filling, potential coupling and critical quadratic cancellation are model inputs. The physical origin of the interfaces is not derived. LOCAL GRAVITATIONAL MATCHING K_b = 1/(4*pi*G) V(g) = K_b*g^2/2 + A_E*integral_0^1 [e(u*g/g_dark)-e(0)] du A_E = 3*K_b*g_dark^2/(2*a2) mu(g) = V'(g)/(K_b*g) div[mu(g) grad(Phi)] = 4*pi*G*rho_b. The critical matching gives mu(g) approximately g/a0 at low acceleration, where a0=g_dark/b and b=9*c3/(8*a2)=0.821900196062788. The spherical result g approximately sqrt(a0*g_N) is the known MOND limit, not an independently new prediction. INTERFACE BENCHMARK F_J[x] = e[x]-e[mean] + a2*mean(x^2-mean^2) - mean[J*(x-mean)] mean(x) fixed; J_j = J*cos(2*pi*j/L). Stationarity: L*de/dx_j + 2*a2*x_j - J_j = constant. All L-1 mean-preserving degrees of freedom are optimized. The source J is conjugate to x; it is not a baryonic matter density. Period | Mean | J | Local A1 | Full-band A1 | Full/local 8 | 0 | 0.002 | 0.113758 | 0.0100562 | 0.08840 16 | 0 | 0.002 | 0.115434 | 0.0263809 | 0.22854 32 | 0 | 0.002 | 0.115725 | 0.0604906 | 0.52271 8 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.337580 | 0.100420 | 0.29747 16 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.342613 | 0.225241 | 0.65742 32 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.343504 | 0.306478 | 0.89221 16 | 0 | 0.0001 | 0.0272847| 0.00132260 | 0.04847 16 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.119111 | 0.113798 | 0.95540 A1 is the first cosine component of the equilibrium displacement. The full-band/local ratio is not a solar quadrupole reduction factor. Maximum stationary residual: 9.61302e-10. Minimum constrained curvature: 0.0330578. Maximum relative profile change between quadratures 4x24 and 8x40: 4.47386e-6. Both signs of Bloch momentum are integrated. Static stability is checked only within each tested period and fixed mean. Global, arbitrary-period and dynamical stability are not established. 392 additional sampled momenta show no occupation crossing. This does not prove filling between sample points. INFRARED CHECK At a critical uniform background and infinitesimal perturbation: DeltaK(Q) = chi(0)-chi(Q) = (v0*M^2/8)*|Q| + subleading terms. Predicted coefficient: 0.124379648776. At Q=0.0001, full-band DeltaK/Q=0.124397318206. Relative difference from the limit: 1.42060e-4. Maximum relative quadrature change: 2.93530e-7. The direct calculation uses centered momenta p+/-Q/2 and geometrically subdivided radial integration, without subtracting or fitting the expected coefficient. The local cubic energy and the quadratic infrared kernel cannot simply be added as a controlled approximation for arbitrary x/Q. OBSERVATIONS The local model was compared descriptively with 2693 SPARC RAR data points, using a spherical proxy, one fitted acceleration scale per Wilson value, and selection among eight Wilson coefficients. Selected r_W=0.45: RMS 0.147918553 dex. Empirical one-scale reference: RMS 0.132813205 dex. g_dark=1.829549125e-10 m/s^2; a0=2.225999134e-10 m/s^2. There is no held-out galaxy validation or resolved disk field fit. The fit is not a dark-matter halo or full cosmological model comparison. At the selected galaxy parameters, the local solar model gives Q2=2.358148919e-26 s^-2 (384x288 grid, middle extraction window, external acceleration 2e-10 m/s^2). Cassini: Q2=(1.6+/-1.8)e-27 s^-2, with 1-sigma observational uncertainty, from Park et al. (2026), version 2. The initial 27-case local audit did not remove the tension. Six further solutions refine the selected model and test large weak-field changes. The local Q2 changes by 0.00602% from 256x192 to 384x288, and by 0.01728% from the previous 192x144 reference. It needs a 77.95% reduction to reach the quoted measurement's upper +2-sigma edge, 5.2e-27 s^-2. The model has no assigned complete theoretical error; these numbers are not used to claim a combined statistical significance. Counterfactual local diagnostics impose mu_modified=max(mu_LQ8,floor). They are not derived nonlocal corrections or new theories fitted to Cassini. At 384x288, floor=0.3 gives Q2=2.358013262e-26 s^-2 (-0.005753%), and floor=0.6 gives Q2=2.335801022e-26 s^-2 (-0.947688%). The same diagnostics also converge on a 256x192 grid. All six nonlinear residuals are below 3.32e-10. The floors act below g/g_dark=0.28119 and 0.56668, respectively. A local Poisson-source budget uses three reconstructions: the Laplacian, the vacuum PDE, and -div[(mu-1)grad Phi]. Their total integrals agree with the first-derivative Green extraction within 0.375% across three grids. Two versus four Gauss nodes per native spline cell change totals by at most 0.0393%. About 96% of the signed net quadrupole source integral lies at 0.3-3 R_dark, approximately 1700-17000 AU. R_dark=sqrt(GM/g_dark)=5693 AU, using the existing solver's GM=(6.67430e-11)*(1.98847e30), slightly different from the nominal IAU GM used below. Positive and negative sources cancel. Below g=0.1*g_dark, the absolute quadrupole-weighted source integral is about 0.07-0.12% of |Q2|, depending on reconstruction. The finest source quadrature has no samples below 0.03*g_dark. That recorded zero is not a physical absence of a saddle region. Microscopic structure is unresolved. This local source budget does not bound nonlocal backreaction. No nonlocal solar Q2 has been calculated. The distinct Cassini relativistic light-delay/PPN gamma test also has no LQ8 metric prediction. Passing it has not been established. FITTED EFFECTIVE EXTENSION Subsequent fitted effective extension (distinct from original LQ8): Delta V/(Kb*g_dark^2)=(27/16)*A*T^2*t^4/(1+t^2)^2, t=x/T. mu_new=mu_8+(27/4)*A*t^2/(1+t^2)^3. Selected A=-0.45, T=4.25, g_dark=1.571663986e-10 m/s^2. These shape parameters were chosen using known Cassini and Gaia constraints. The record retains 46 shapes and 96 solar solves, including failed choices. RAR RMS=0.1471763 dex; empirical reference remains better at 0.1328132 dex. The response is nonmonotonic and has a visible galaxy-curve feature. At Gaia's central external field 2.32e-10, Q2=-0.45050e-27 s^-2 at 384x288. At the sampled external fields 2.00,2.16,2.32,2.48,2.64 (1e-10 m/s^2), all five inner Q2 values lie inside Cassini's quoted +/-2-sigma band. This is a compatibility fit, not an independent prediction or joint posterior. The outer extraction window reaches a region with a nonconstant quadrupole; its different values are retained. Inner windows and the Green check support the inner Solar System coefficient. A common Cartesian 3D potential is also solved without axial symmetry, using two unequal ellipsoidal overdensities and a compensating periodic background. The 17^3,25^3,33^3,49^3 grids converge; the last restricted force change is 0.164%. It is a synthetic benchmark, not an observed galaxy. The solar solver itself is already a 3D equation reduced by axial symmetry. An algebraic auxiliary-scalar representation supplies the same effective energy; neither its quantum origin nor a relativistic completion is derived. Source, data and figures: https://emergent-gravity.com/observations/#extension PHYSICAL SCALE OF THE ORIGINAL QUANTUM REALIZATION The critical isotropic matching gives L8 = (pi^2/16)*(b/M)*a_lattice = 0.506989362*a_lattice for M=1. Assuming c_D=c, one copy, physical layers with Sigma*thickness <= 1, and confinement thickness >= v0*a_lattice/Omega: a_lattice <= 1.98151110e-4 m; L8 <= 1.00460505e-4 m. The solar low-acceleration radius sqrt(GM_solar/a0)=7.72135147e14 m. Their ratio is at most 1.30107411e-19 under these assumptions. This is a dimensional comparison, not a rigorous bound on the nonlinear solar quadrupole. A collective astronomical range needs its own derivation. A_E=8.28499390e-10 J/m^3 is the matched energy prefactor, not a prediction of the cosmological constant. NEXT DERIVATION x_alpha=B_alpha*Phi, B_alpha*Phi=(n_alpha.grad Phi)/g_dark. V[Phi]=K_b/2 + sum_alpha w_alpha E_alpha[B_alpha Phi] + . K_b*L_g*Phi + sum_alpha w_alpha B_alpha^dagger dE_alpha/dx_alpha + rho_b = 0, where L_g=-Laplacian is positive. Geometry, sampling, measures, adjoints, orientation weights, physical lengths and a common-potential solver still need to be specified. The quadratic compensation must be counted once. Relativistic dynamics, universal metric coupling, stress-energy closure, lensing and cosmology are not established by the interface calculation. REPRODUCTION https://emergent-gravity.com/research/ The package reproduces the eight interface equilibria and spatial infrared integral; its scope does not include regenerating the astronomical comparisons from raw observations. The latter numerical records are published separately. Source and input SHA-256 manifests are included. PRIMARY REFERENCES McGaugh, Lelli and Schombert (2016), Physical Review Letters 117, 201101. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05917 SPARC: https://astroweb.case.edu/SPARC/ Park et al. (2026), Improved constraints on modified Newtonian gravity from Cassini radio tracking data, v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17884v2 Bertotti, Iess and Tortora (2003), A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft, Nature 425, 374-376. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01997 Blanchet and Marsat (2011), Physical Review D 84, 044056. https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5264 IAU 2015 Resolution B3. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.07674 NIST CODATA constants. https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Table/allascii.txt PUBLICATION NOTE This is an exploratory computational project developed with AI assistance. No independent experimental verification of the proposed medium is reported.